Invasive technologies, by definition, tend to have the most initial resistance to their introduction to society. It can be hard to imagine a future world in which new and sometimes disturbing, often painfully-disruptive technologies come to be accepted, even common, parts of our lives.
Sarcology, recently updated and re-released, depicts a future world full of these invasive technologies, making it easy for the reader to question the likelihood and desirability of this future reality.
But given time, and often contrary to public perception, we have seen that even the most invasive of tech can overcome initial resistance and become accepted, even ubiquitous, in society.Continue reading
Drone technology has been growing by leaps and bounds over the past decade, a unique convergence of kids’ toys and military-grade surveillance equipment that is inexorably reaching into other aspects of our lives, filling in the gaps between those extremes. And as it develops, we are already seeing signs that this could signify another quantum shift in the impact of technology in our everyday lives. Continue reading
Last week’s nightmare in Boston makes for an interesting argument about the state of security in the United States at the moment, and the value in improving that security for all American citizens. Though it’s hard to say the bombing at the Boston Marathon wouldn’t have happened if security had been tighter, it is easy to say it would have been significantly more difficult to have happened… that the perpetrators would have been likely captured or killed sooner… and that the American public is behind law enforcement when it comes to protecting our skins. Continue reading
The use of flying surveillance drones is beginning to move from the battlefield to our domestic shores. Not surprisingly, it is stirring up plenty of controversy.
Some of the concern reflects the present use of drones in battle areas. Equipped with sophisticated surveillance equipment and lethal munitions, military drones are sent on reconnaissance and surgical kill missions against military targets, leaders and terrorists. Which all sounds fine in a battle situation (even if they still result in some collateral damage); but what about in the USA? Some citizens are concerned that Americans in the US would be singled out as targets for military-grade drones to attack, and they question whether an American citizen determined to be a threat against other Americans should be surgically killed on American soil.
Okay… that’s not entirely true. The real concern American citizens have is that our government, not being infallible, will be told by some anonymous or insane source that one of us law-abiding citizens is a terrorist; and that the government, not questioning or investigating said information, will fire off a drone to take us out on our way to Burger King. Continue reading
Yes, I said it. I used the words. Put the two together, something so many people are loathe to do, and spelled out “gun control.”
Because somebody needs to.
The U.S. has had a gun problem for quite some time. It’s like a nationwide addiction that no one is willing to address, much less treat. Why? Because over two centuries ago, our forefathers told us we have a right to own and use guns. (Mind you, this was written when the country was on a wartime footing on its own shores… details, details.) And today, although we haven’t fought a war on our lands for over a century, we have dangerous people among us, and we want to protect ourselves.
So we buy guns. Many of us don’t learn to use them properly… many of us don’t store them properly… many of us keep ammo in them, leave safeties off and put them where kids can get at them… but there you go. We feel safer. Continue reading