I recently encountered a Facebook post by an author of a science fiction novel based around the idea of global cooling. He had discovered a website of climate theorists, the Space and Science Research Center, whose opinions roughly matched those of his book, and was proud to point out the connection.
Unfortunately, the SSRC is an avowed anti-warming group, whose theories are not backed by actual scientific data:
“The Space and Science Research Center (SSRC) is (apparently) a for-profit company located in Orlando, FL. They appear to have an anti-global warming agenda, though their arguments have yet to be examined in detail. They present an appearance of scientific grounding, but they do not seem to have any peer-reviewed papers on their theories.” (From Issuepedia)
I politely pointed this out, and added that “although it’s nice to take your SF from the headlines, one should caution whose headlines are being read…”
However, my point was essentially ignored by other posters, including the author, all of whom expressed little or no concern about whether the science in the story was actually correct. One such poster lauded the author, and added:
“I suspect your book will be much better fiction than anything peddled by the SSRC. Science does not have to be believable, as long as your characters are.”
When I read that, a small part of me died inside.