Do we need a publishing industry?


A recent article by Eoin Purcell examined the damage done to the publishing industry by the Agency pricing scheme.  His take on it was that publishers had lost the battle and the war to maintain their position in the publishing industry, and that it was about time for existing publishers to make way for the new breed of publishers, or find a way to re-invent themselves to take advantage of the new digital era.

Eoin’s impression is that the publishing industry must evolve, or perish and be replaced.  But I wonder about that: Do we need a replacement for the publishing industry’s existing players?  Do we need a publishing industry at all?

Let’s examine the idea of the “industry” part of the equation: An industry is generally defined in two ways, either as an aggregate of activities related to a particular field or product, or as the sum of organizations working in cooperation to produce and disseminate a product.  For the purposes of this discussion, we will consider the latter definition of the publishing industry, that is, the companies that work in concert to produce books to sell.

Publishers would fit within the latter definition as part of the equation of companies; most call them the middlemen between authors and readers, though a closer examination of their role reveals them to be the middlemen between the authors’ agents, and the distribution point (the bookstore).

A clear-cut process has been in place for decades, orchestrating the process by which agents bring books to publishers, and publishers work with those books to package them for optimum sales potential in bookstores, chains and other markets.  The publishers are largely responsible for creating and developing this process, creating predictable relationships with agents at one end, and controlling the supply of books to retail outlets at the other end.  They have also been primarily responsible for marketing their products via pre-arranged outlets and cooperative services.  And until recently, this process has worked successfully for publishers, even when it was not so successful for the agents at one end or the retail outlets at the other.

Enter the future, in two pieces: First, the computer, which gave individuals the tools and power to create that they never had before; and second, the internet, which connected individuals to goods and services, and other people, around the world.  With the computer came tools to make writing easier and faster—suddenly, someone who could spare the time could write a novel, use computer-assisted tools to improve, proof and edit the novel, create covers, and save it in formats that others could use to call up and read the book.  Thanks to that breakthrough, the number of writers grew.

The second piece of the future, the internet, opened new communications avenues for individuals.  Sharing was the new activity of the close of the twentieth century, and the internet made sharing easier than it had ever been.  Potential authors could now share their stories with others, and gain free critiques and suggestions of the type that editors provided to their paying clients.  Authors could also share software (not always legally) and suggestions as to how best to create and finalize their books.

The internet then created digital commerce, internet-based avenues to sell products, and most importantly, the tools to bring those capabilities to the individual.  No longer was it necessary to build a giant corporation dedicated to selling and distributing a product; it could now be sold out of a basement using a computer, a connection to the web and a service like PayPal to handle money transactions.

Put the pieces together, and you have author-entrepreneurs—like myself—capable of creating a novel independently of (or selectively working with) outside assistance, as well as creating a venue to sell that product, access the tools needed to monetize and control selling of the product, and to market that product regionally, nationally or even globally.

Such author-entrepreneurs have, in no time, reached levels that the existing publishing industry had made virtually impossible for outsiders to reach beforehand: They are visible to the public; and they are making sales in major outlets.  Both of these points were aided by the change in the end of the publishing chain, the decay of the bookstore system.  The economy has been driving the bookstore and bookstore chains out of business, and as they were the publishers’ primary and absolutely-controlled sales outlet, publishers have been forced to put more of their eggs into baskets of which they have little or no control, such as space in retail stores and chains.

Some of the biggest retail spaces are online, such as Amazon; and in this area, publishers have found themselves without the advantage of control.  Even paid advertisement doesn’t accomplish online what it does in other outlets.  And right next to their products are books sold by independent authors, some of whose work is directly comparable in quality to that of the publishers.  Many authors are happy with their position selling directly through online outlets, and see no reason to seek publishers, through their agents, in order to sell their books.  It would seem that the publishers, their agents, and their failing retail outlets have become redundant in the modern market.

Given the facts, it is by no means out of the question to answer: No, we do not need agents, publishers or dedicated retail outlets; or, at least, we do not need the publishing model that we have enjoyed for the past few decades.  In fact, we could get along just fine without it, as independent authors have discovered and demonstrated.

But this answer begs another question, perhaps even more important than the first: Would we be better off without the publishing industry?  Perhaps, if the current industry cannot sustain itself, if it is not needed, then we’d be better off without its impact on (or interference with) the new digital industry under current development.  On the other hand, the old publishing industry has learned a lot about what kind of writing has the most impact on markets and individuals, what kind of language is best suited for what markets, and how to take advantage of trends and position products… in other words, how best to sell books.  That knowledge is not worthless.

So, instead of merely wishing the old publishing model to implode, and take all of its resources with it, we should be encouraging the old publishing industry to bang its 20th century swords into 21st century plowshares, and to find its place in the new digital market.  If they can offer to independent authors services that will improve their product quality, they will have proven their value.  If they can increase that product’s sales enough to live comfortably off of a percentage of the profits, they will have proven their worth.

It won’t be publishing, in the old sense; but it will have similarities to the old values of publishing, primarily the core values of aiding authors and improving their products.


5 thoughts on “Do we need a publishing industry?

  1. At a minimum, indie authors need a proof reader. It would be even nicer if they paid for a good editor. A good cover also helps to sell books, but then the publishing industry was not well respected for that service, often putting out covers that were done by someone who had obviously not read the book. What they do not need is some gatekeeper to decide what the public would like to read. That is a form of censorship and in my opinion, censorship is always bad.


  2. Proofing is clearly one of the services that should be offered to writers, though I admit to believing that there are writers who can proof their own material… maybe not most of them, but some have had the proper training and can do the job on their own.

    Editing is a tougher call: Editors can pinpoint problems in a narrative; but they also tend to steer a narrative in a direction that might be commercially viable, but not what the writer had in mind… after all, that’s their job, but in the new writer’s market, commercial viability isn’t what it used to be.

    I’m glad we’ve reached an era where gatekeepers are going out of style, and anyone can get anything they want much more easily. I suppose gatekeeping is a form of censorship, though I always considered it to be simply popular market domination. I used to be one of those who always found it hard to find reading matter, because most of the popular material out there didn’t interest me. But I never believed they were excluding my favorite books on purpose… just that they were selling what would make the most money, and my non-pop attitudes didn’t matter to them.

    So I’d love to see all the effort formerly spent on gatekeeping going towards improving all the new novels out there.


  3. Donn


    One of my favorite authors, in the mystery-detective genre is Earl Emerson.

    He has been: ” nominated for the Edgar Award for best mystery of the year and he’s won the Shamus for best private eye novel. Black Hearts and Slow Dancing was named one of the ten best thrillers of the year by the New York Times.”

    But he is doubtful he will be published again in print. He is taking all of the back catalog he has rights to, and republishing it digitally. He has a new book which he is submitting, but does not believe will be published because he is not an “A list” writer.

    The paper publishing world is a lowest common denominator enterprise. It is doomed.

    Unless it is a “coffee table book” or one requiring large graphics, I do not buy paper anymore.

    I would hope that independent copy editors will be a major enterprise now. i see no other need that the paper publishing industry has provided other than editing that is needed now.

    Here is one links to Earl’s Blog on modern publishing

    Here is the link to his main blog


  4. Donn, we (and Earl) are of the same mind in this. Of course, the world is still full of “lowest common denominator” industries, and by their nature, they tend to hang on a long time. But ebooks and the internet are changing the dynamic more quickly and intensely than in most industries.

    Also, I’m not a “midlist author” like Earl, but I hold out hope that D-listers like me will be able to find a footing and reach the comparable level of sales that Earl enjoys. The new ebook market gives me a better chance of achieving that than anything else.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s